A split-screen or before/after visual comparison of a desk calendar, showing the chaotic old schedule versus the structured new one.

My 30-Day Experiment with a “Four-Day Workweek”: Why I Almost Quit in Week Two (And Why I Staid)

By [Trickdigi]

Six months ago, I hit a wall.

My business was growing, revenue was up, but I was miserable. I was working six days a week, constantly checking email on Sundays, and my brain felt like a browser with 50 tabs open. I was suffering from classic entrepreneurial burnout.

I kept reading headlines about the magical “Four-Day Workweek.” Studies claimed it increased productivity, boosted happiness, and solved world peace.

It sounded too good to be true. As a small business owner, if I don’t work, things don’t get done. I don’t have a massive team to pick up the slack.

But desperation makes you try crazy things. So, I committed to a 30-day experiment: Fridays off. Period.

I thought it would be a month of relaxation and efficiency. Instead, the first two weeks were total chaos.

Here is the honest reality of trying to compress five days of work into four, the mistakes I made, and the strict rules that finally made it work.

The Setup: The “Compressed” Model

There are two ways to do a four-day week:

  1. The Reduction Model: Work less (e.g., 32 hours) for the same pay.

  2. The Compression Model: Work the same amount (40 hours), but squeezed into four days.

As a business owner, I couldn’t afford to just do less work. I had to choose the Compression Model.

My New Schedule: Monday through Thursday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM (10-hour days). Fridays off.

The Reality Slap: Why Week 2 Was a Nightmare

The first Friday off was glorious. I went for a hike. I didn’t look at my phone. I felt rejuvenated.

Then Monday hit.

Because I hadn’t actually reduced my workload, my Mondays and Tuesdays became unbearable pressure cookers. I felt constantly behind. By Wednesday afternoon, my brain was fried because I was working 10-hour days at full intensity without the usual “water cooler” breaks.

The Breaking Point:

On the second Thursday at 5:00 PM, I still had three major client deliverables due. I had to make a choice: miss the deadlines, or break my own rule and work on Friday.

I ended up working half of Friday, resenting the experiment the entire time. I was ready to quit. The four-day week wasn’t making me more productive; it was just making my four working days more stressful.

The Pivot: The 3 Rules That Saved the Experiment

I realized my mistake: You cannot just remove 20% of your available time without removing 20% of the noise.

I had changed my schedule, but I hadn’t changed my systems.

Before giving up, I implemented three strict rules for Weeks 3 and 4.

Rule 1: “No-Meeting Mondays” and “Deep Work” Mornings

I realized meetings were killing my compressed schedule. If I had three hours of Zoom calls on a Monday, my 10-hour day was ruined before it started.

  • The Fix: Mondays are now blocked for zero meetings.

  • The Daily Routine: Every day from 8:00 AM to 11:00 AM is sacred “Deep Work” time. My phone is in another room. Slack is closed. This is when the hard tasks get done.

Rule 2: Asynchronous Client Communication

My clients were used to me replying instantly. When I disappeared on Fridays, they panicked.

  • The Fix: I set clear boundaries. I updated my email signature and voicemail to state clearly: “Our office hours are Mon-Thurs. Emails received on Friday will be answered Monday morning.”

  • The Reality: Most things aren’t emergencies. By forcing clients to wait until Monday, I trained them (and myself) to realize the world wouldn’t end over the weekend.

Rule 3: Ruthless Prioritization (The “One Thing” Rule)

With only four days, I could no longer lie to myself about my to-do list. A list of 20 items was impossible.

  • The Fix: Every morning, I identify the Single Most Important Task (SMIT). If I only get that one thing done, the day is a success. Everything else is bonus.

The Data: Before vs. After

Did it actually work once I fixed the systems? I tracked my output and mood for the month before and the month during the experiment.

Metric The 5-Day Grind (Before) The 4-Day Compression (After)
Total Hours Worked ~50 Hours (spread out) ~42 Hours (intense)
Major Tasks Completed Avg 12 per week Avg 15 per week
Friday Stress Level (1-10) 8 (Exhausted) 2 (Relaxed)
Sunday “Scaries” High anxiety for Monday Low / Excited for Monday

The Insight: Paradoxically, by working fewer days, I got more major tasks done. Why? Because the “scarcity” of time forced me to stop procrastinating. When you know you have to finish by Thursday at 6 PM, you stop scrolling Twitter.

The Verdict: Is It Sustainable?

I am writing this on a Thursday afternoon. Tomorrow, I will not open my laptop.

Yes, the four-day week is sustainable, but only if you are willing to be incredibly disciplined during those four days.

It is not a “life hack” for laziness. It is a forcing function for efficiency.

My four workdays are harder and more intense than they used to be. I am more tired on Thursday night than I used to be on Friday night.

But the trade-off—having three full days to recover, pursue hobbies, and actually live a life outside of my business—is worth the squeeze.

If you try this, expect the first two weeks to be a disaster. Push through the chaos, fix your systems, and you might find you never want to work a Friday again.